🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. HMO. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. HDHP. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands all this stuff? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Nor the typical worker. Selecting the appropriate medical coverage for companies – or for our families – seems like demands advanced expertise in medical insurance.

The Medical System Isn't Just Complex, It Is Expensive

According to recent research, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). The average employer health insurance cost is projected to surpass $17,000 per employee in 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Now federal operations has ceased functioning due to political disagreements regarding tax credits which analysts predict will lead to a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Will We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we seriously consider a national health insurance program in the United States? I have to believe we're getting closer because this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare system – an insurance system – merely extend to include all citizens. The existing system remains intact. How our healthcare providers receive payment would change. Believe me, they'll adapt.

The Way Universal Coverage Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would need payments from employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker making moderate income must contribute about five point three percent toward medical coverage. The company must contribute approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem expensive? Unless you contrast that with what average American pays. I can name dozens of businesses who are routinely paying anywhere from 8% to 15% of payroll costs for medical benefits. Remember that with comprehensive systems, these contributions include pension plans, sick pay, maternity leave and unemployment benefits along with supporting medical services. When you add these expenses versus our current spending on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Implementation for America

For America, a national health premium would increase existing Medicare taxes, a framework already established. It should be means-based – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. There would be both an employee and employer contribution. And, like many our government's defense, IT, social programs and transportation services, the system should be outsourced by private contractors rather than a government office.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program represents a significant advantage for small businesses like mine. It would place small companies in equal competition against big corporations that can pay for better plans. It would make management significantly simpler (a payroll deduction processed similarly to social security and healthcare taxes, instead of individual transactions to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would enable simpler to plan expenses our yearly costs, rather than going through the complicated (and ineffective) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers that we must do each year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding about benefits among workers – contrasted with the current system where they have to decipher the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would definitely exist less liability for companies since we wouldn't have access to our employees' medical records for purposes of risk assessment and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as they get. But I've learned that public institutions play important functions in society, including national security to funding needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare to all via universal healthcare enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, easier system for entrepreneurs which hire the majority of the country's workers and generate half of our GDP. It makes it possible employees to be healthier, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Exist numerous factors I'm not addressing? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses experienced recently, it's evident that current healthcare legislation is not working effectively. And I realize that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms are easier to implement. But expanding Medicare for all, even with increased taxation that would be incurred, would remain a better and more affordable strategy for not only managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, must tone down our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't so great. The US places significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, according to major studies. Maybe one positive aspect amid present circumstances is that we undertake serious examination in the mirror and acknowledge that major reforms need to happen.