🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to restart nuclear talks with the United States as long as it is treated with "respect" and "honor", Tehran's top diplomat has announced.

The Iranian diplomat stated only diplomacy produced results, and disclosed fresh requests had been made by intermediaries to reopen negotiations with the American leadership. He asserted Iran possessed no unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran was not yet able to allow the UN nuclear inspectorate to visit struck enrichment centers for protective measures.

Walking a Difficult Path

Araghchi is walking a complex route since Iran aims to avoid appear to be acting from a position of weakness, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out more powerful in military terms and mentally from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.

He was addressing at a security conference in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material within its borders that it will always maintain" – the key factor of the impasse in the previous talks.

Prior Negotiations Abruptly Concluded

The previous five rounds of discussions between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and acrimonious end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, attacked Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that concluded with the US president asserting the locations had been obliterated. Following this, Western states employed their authority to restore international penalties, but Iran asserts they have not had a major impact.

Perfect Agreement Offered

Iran's diplomats stated they felt they had attained a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could enrich uranium. The two nations would have been able to declare success since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's enrichment initiative was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been agreed in the talks that American atomic experts could work inside Iran, but that was a logical implication of the cooperative offer. Diplomats asserted three times they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to fall apart due to "opponents in the US".

Existing Status

Iranian officials stated the consortium offer was now off the table, but it seems highly likely the proposal could be resurrected in some form if negotiations restart.

The US president recently said he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to restart talks, but in private Iranian officials claim they are not yet getting consistent overtures from America either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of passivity in the aftermath of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran asserts diplomacy is not part of a performance.

Negotiating Stance

In his speech to the gathering, intended to paint the US as a controlling nation that exploits the idea of worldwide standards, Araghchi declared the fortnight-long engagement showed the dispute could not be resolved by combat operations. He said the attacks began with a American requirement for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.

Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with total Washington understanding and coordination, making confidence hard to reestablish.

Diplomacy Remains the Primary Solution

Araghchi stated: "It was not Iran that had abandoned dialogue; it was America and the Western nations that had always sought to impose their will during the talks. Diplomacy can still be alive and stays the primary solution to address conflicts, but its requirements, guidelines and fundamentals must be adhered to."

"If they address to the citizens of Tehran with the tone of respect and honor, they will receive a response in the same approach."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is described by Tehran representatives as the battle of recovery and reconstruction, the foreign minister stated he was confident Iran's security strengths "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been rebuilt. We acquired many lessons from this war; we have discovered our personal limitations and the shortcomings of the enemy."

He continued: "We effectively endured this war. Our nuclear technology, which they aimed to eliminate, continues to exist. The sites and gear, if destroyed, will be rebuilt; what is essential is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they targeted, but were unable to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have become stronger, more cohesive, and more supportive of the leadership and the country in the face of this attack."